They even ignore that the Japanese were already destitute and surrendering, and revert to their BS patriotically edited "history" to justify something which was merely a live test for the weapon and a "message" for the post-war times. The US didn't have colonies at the time, but they had millions of blacks they brought to serve them.įact 5: People who consider Hitler evil (and why not!), leave the people who dropped two atomic bombs on civilian cities - on men, women, chidren, babies, elderly etc - scot free. Hitler himself wrote that he took the idea of the concentration camps from the US confinement of Native Americans ( - random reference to the first link I found, there are tons of works on those camps you can look up).įact 4: Focusing just on some historical events (the Holocaust) misses the bigger picture, of western powers holding BILLION of people as slaves in their colonies, including millions of deaths, lynchings, official executions, maimings and the like. KKK was also against Hispanic, balkan, etc immigrants). Similar ideas about the historical role of Germany, of the German people, etc, including anti-semitism were held by many German people even before Hitler became known, including prominent philosophers like Heidegger and Carl Smitt, artists and so on.įact 3: Anti-semitism was ripe in the US too, as was tons of other kinds of racism (not just against blacks. And they did know how he got in power and what his beliefs were.įact 2: Hitler wasn't some lone evil guy who brainwashed a nation. And he has to place it in it's context and consider whether his side was just as "evil".įact 1: Before there was an official war Hitler was quite beloved in the West (including the USA), both as an ally against the communists and as an example of a strong "man of the state" against the "enemy within" (leftists, unions, liberals, etc). One has to understand "evil" (historically) not just loath it, in order to avoid it. Even if one means it well ("if we all repugned by such evil, we will avoid it") it doesn't work that way in actual life, for it tends to stick to some people and events and ignore others. Those kind of after-the-fact statements are just cargo-cult that tend to obscure real historical understanding. Perhaps this is a consequence of the medium, in which case established science (as opposed to politics) would be the topic of choice.Įvil is a religious idea. There is no room in such a worldview for nuance. Having (what I presume to be) the ISIS emblem and a bunch of skulls around it seems like it's telling me "these guys bad", "those guys good", which is a bit authoritative for my taste and feels like it's from a dystopian classroom where we are told what to think. However if you give me a piece of art, you are basically telling me a story whose validity I have no way of discerning (within the framework i.e. Maybe I'm not used to viewing such media, but it feels like if you gave me a piece of text, I could read it and decide for myself whether or not it makes valid arguments. I think it might be a good idea to stick with science and topics that aren't controversial, because otherwise it seems a bit like propaganda. It's a nice idea, but the pictures about ISIS are a bit disturbing. The audio explanation does give a fair treatment of the subject matter. would never be possible on a streaming media.Įdit: I was looking at the pictures rather than watching the video. KURZGESAGT NARRATOR TVAlso, the pure speed of the videos makes them more entertaining than any TV show could, because TV has to aim for the lowest common recognition speed at every time. For example of the latter, take a look at this video - describing the same concept (expansion of the universe does not have a center) in book would have been much more awkward. I'm fascinated by this new avenue of educational material as it can provide the best parts of both books and tv if done well: You can pause and play back any parts you have difficulties to understand or want to think through more thoroughly and you have the benefit of both visual and auditive information channels in parallel. Grey's, Crashcourse's and Henry Reich's channels. If you like this kind of dense educational videos I can recommend C.G.P. They also have a German channel, which unfortunately is not up to date with the English one, though. Also, in contrast to their website, their Youtube channel only contains educational videos and no promotional material.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |